iLaw Employment Briefing - World Cup Special

  

The 2010 FIFA World Cup kicks off in South Africa on 11th June, culminating in the final on 11th July.     The tournament could prove a major headache for Employers, large and small, many of whom will experience sudden requests for time off work or employees going absent.  An additional risk that will need to be managed is the potential for discrimination claims.

 

In this article we will look at:-   

 

1.            Dealing with multiple requests for time off

2.            Dealing with absenteeism

3.            Avoiding claims of discrimination

 

Following our simple guidance should help Employers and Employees have a clear understanding of each other's expectations, meaning that everyone can get on and enjoy the tournament!

  

1.            Dealing with multiple requests for time off

 

There are a number of possibilities open to Employers in an attempt to appease staff who are desperate for time off, whilst ensuring that disruption to the workplace is kept to a minimum.     Here are some ideas which it is hoped will motivate staff as opposed to demoralising them:

 

•         Try and secure agreement with Employees well in advance if at all possible so that they can take annual leave if they need time off and are avid fans.   It is a good idea to have a written policy so that Employers can allocate time off on either a random or a ‘first come first served' basis up to a maximum quota in various parts of the workplace in order to minimise disruption to the business at vital times.    Alternatively there is nothing to stop Employers preventing staff from taking annual leave during this period but this is likely to prove unpopular and some staff may want time off for other genuine reasons, for example to go on holiday.    A prohibition may also prove counter-productive and cause an increase in sickness absence.

 

•         Another option is to consider special unpaid leave for some members of staff, especially if a particular member of staff's annual leave entitlement has been exhausted.  The problem with this type of arrangement is that it will only work where  a small number of the workforce requires time off and again Employers can consider accommodating staff on a random or a ‘first come first served' basis.   In addition it is also fair to be consistent in this approach with other major sporting events where diehard fans want time off, for example to watch Wimbledon, the Grand Prix or major cricketing events.

 

•         Consider introducing temporary flexible working practices on match days whereby staff can be given longer breaks to enable them to watch vital matches, on the basis that they attend work earlier or later to make up the time, or perhaps work through their usual lunch break.    This may however not be possible for all businesses to accommodate.   Employers will also need to monitor time keeping to ensure that the system is not being abused.     If staff are working fixed rota systems then do consider allowing staff the opportunity of swapping their shifts with other work colleagues.

 

•         Some Employers may be more generous, allowing staff to watch vital matches by screening them in the workplace. You can perhaps allow staff the opportunity to watch the match on a flexible working basis as long as they make up the time.   Alternatively Employers may wish to operate a rota system whereby all staff have the option of having a short break at regular intervals.    Again it is vital to have a written policy and to warn staff that you are providing this on a discretionary basis and that any abuse of the privilege will result in its being withdrawn.   The benefit of this is that staff are at work and productive for the most part instead of having to take annual leave and it will undoubtedly be a morale booster.   

 

•         Many Employers of course prohibit alcohol in the workplace, and whether Employers decide to relax their policies in this respect depends on their size and resources and importantly the type of work that staff are expected to undertake, for example whether this will involve the use of machinery or require concentration after the match has finished.   Our advice is to adhere to any existing prohibitions on consuming alcohol in the workplace in order to avoid additional problems that could affect performance and conduct and to keep any disruption to the business to a minimum.

 

2.            Dealing with sudden absenteeism

 

Many Employers will find a number of Employees will be tempted to take a ‘sickie' on match days or the following day if they have a post match hangover, or in fact may simply fail to turn up without any advance warning or notification.    The best way to deal with this type of abuse is for Employers to be proactive in taking action by reminding staff in advance of all relevant polices.    Here are some suggestions:

 

•         Employers could issue all staff with an early internal memo or notification which clearly reminds everyone of the internal company policy on watching World Cup matches, and consuming alcohol in the work place.     The memo or notification should also remind staff that anyone who attends work either late or not at all on match days or post match days without prior authorisation may be subject to disciplinary action in accordance with any internal disciplinary procedure.   This will involve a degree of internal investigation with the issuing of a formal warning.  In severe cases involving dishonesty on the part of the Employee it may justify dismissal either with or without notice.    Employers are also reminded that they need to follow the ACAS Code of conduct in implementing any fair and reasonable internal disciplinary procedure.

 

•         Employers can require that employees who phone in sick on match days or post match days provide medical evidence in the form of a relevant sickness certificate.      The problem here, however, is that not all General Practitioners may be willing to provide a sickness certificate as they do not have to do so for sickness absences of less than 7 days.   In addition some General Practitioners may charge for the privilege.     It is important for Employers to implement any policy consistently, even for those members of staff who you do not suspect of abusing your policies and who may have a genuine ailment.

 

3.            Avoiding allegations of discrimination

 

Another important consideration for Employers is not to be accused of unlawfully discriminating in favour of one part of the workforce, even innocently!   Employers need to be careful in bringing to the attention of their staff the type of behaviour that they will tolerate when it comes to supporting national teams.   Employers need to make it clear in advance that the teasing of supporters of one team by the supporters of another could easily result in race discrimination complaints.  Remember that Employers are vicariously liable for the unlawful actions of their staff unless they can show that they took reasonable prohibitive steps.  The burden of proof is on the Employer.

 

The World Cup celebrations also tend to bring out women football fans who will be entitled to treatment and consideration equal to their male counterparts in being afforded the same opportunities and the same treatment for any contravention of internal policies.   Failure to treat women in the same way can lead to allegations of sex discrimination.

 

On the other hand some women may not be interested in football but may reasonably request time off for either other sporting events in the calendar year or perhaps non sports events.  Employers need to be consistent in their approach to such requests for time off for other reasons.

 

Conclusion

 

Most Employers will anticipate that there will be a few problems associated with the World Cup.   Legal problems can be kept to a minimum if Employers and their HR Departments plan ahead and make clear to staff what is considered acceptable in terms of seeking time off and conduct in the workplace.  Hopefully Employers who are proactive in this regard will be successful in keeping disruption to a minimum and maintaining acceptable levels of productivity.

 

For further advice on tailoring specific policies to your organisation please contact Steven Eckett on Tel: 020 7489 2059 or by e-mail:  steven.eckett@ilaw.co.uk

news

 

Bribery Act - an overview

Improvements for Employers, 17 01 2011

Employment law changes for 2011, 17 01 2011

Dismissal for promotion of spiritualism not belief discrimination, 17 01 2011

iLaw acting on largest case of 2011

Equality Act 2010, 15.10.2010

TUPE consultation failure case, 15.10.10

Garden leave case, 15.10.10

Minimum wage increases, 15.10.2010

UK tops false sick day league

Employment Tribunal claims rise

Smoking dismissal can be unfair

Redundancy Payment age cap ruled lawful

World Cup Employment Law Briefing, 25 05 2010

Stephen Eckett speaking at Get2Business09

Lawyer Awards, 07.05.09

TUPE hits law firm 03.04.09

Change proposed to redundancy pay 03.04.09

Employment claims rise, 03.04.09

Changes to statutory entitlements, 03.04.09

Statutory employment dispute procedures abolished, 03.04.09

Reseller trade mark use, 18.12.08

FT Innovative Lawyers

FT Innovative Lawyers Awards, 11.08.08

Without Prejudice in Employment, 21.04.08

Key redundancy issues, 21.04.08

Indirect and consequential loss exclusions, 13.03.08

iLaw featured in The Lawyer, 12.11.07

New Companies Act requires details on websites and e-mails, 16.01.07

European Court decision on freezer cabinet exclusivity, 13.10.06

iLaw featured in Lawyer article on boutique firms, 05.10.06

Google victory in US, 04.10.06

Online gaming banned in US, 04.10.06

The application of TUPE in outsourcing deals, 25.09.06

Copyright ruling against Google news links in Belgium, 19.09.06

Competition law - Yamaha forced to change anti-internet distribution policy, 18.09.06

Data protection, passage of customer information between businesses, 15.09.06

Ownership of database rights between agent and principal, 15.09.06

Data protection, binding corporate rules, 15.09.06

Article on legal issues with blogging, 13.09.06

DMH, Osborne Clarke lawyers set up IP/IT firm, 14.08.06