Employee unfairly dismissed for smoking at work

 

Mr McDonough was employed by Bagnall UK, a construction company, as a heavy plant operator and had 15 years' continuous service.   Mr McDonough was also a heavy smoker and had previously been caught smoking in his company car by his Employer, who had failed to implement any form of disciplinary proceedings.

 

In June 2009 the Employer implemented their disciplinary procedure against Mr McDonough for smoking in his company car on a subsequent occasion, although on this occasion Mr McDonough denied the allegations.

 

Mr McDonough alleged at the disciplinary hearing that the Company knew that he and many of his colleagues smoked in their company cars and that they had not taken any previous action.

 

Mr McDonough was nonetheless dismissed for gross misconduct and appealed on the basis that the Company had failed to investigate his allegations that his colleagues had also been smoking in their company cars and he had been victimised.   The appeal was rejected and Mr McDonough issued proceedings in the employment tribunal for unfair dismissal.

 

The employment tribunal held that the Employer's failure to discipline on the previous occasions meant that the decision to dismiss him on this occasion was unfair.  However they also held that Mr McDonough had contributed to his dismissal by 50% and reduced his compensation accordingly.

 

The message to Employers is to ensure that Company rules are understood by all members of staff and that any disciplinary proceedings are implemented in a timely and consistent manner.

 

McDonough -v- Bagnall UK Ltd ET/2104773/09

  

news

 

Bribery Act - an overview

Improvements for Employers, 17 01 2011

Employment law changes for 2011, 17 01 2011

Dismissal for promotion of spiritualism not belief discrimination, 17 01 2011

iLaw acting on largest case of 2011

Equality Act 2010, 15.10.2010

TUPE consultation failure case, 15.10.10

Garden leave case, 15.10.10

Minimum wage increases, 15.10.2010

UK tops false sick day league

Employment Tribunal claims rise

Smoking dismissal can be unfair

Redundancy Payment age cap ruled lawful

World Cup Employment Law Briefing, 25 05 2010

Stephen Eckett speaking at Get2Business09

Lawyer Awards, 07.05.09

TUPE hits law firm 03.04.09

Change proposed to redundancy pay 03.04.09

Employment claims rise, 03.04.09

Changes to statutory entitlements, 03.04.09

Statutory employment dispute procedures abolished, 03.04.09

Reseller trade mark use, 18.12.08

FT Innovative Lawyers

FT Innovative Lawyers Awards, 11.08.08

Without Prejudice in Employment, 21.04.08

Key redundancy issues, 21.04.08

Indirect and consequential loss exclusions, 13.03.08

iLaw featured in The Lawyer, 12.11.07

New Companies Act requires details on websites and e-mails, 16.01.07

European Court decision on freezer cabinet exclusivity, 13.10.06

iLaw featured in Lawyer article on boutique firms, 05.10.06

Google victory in US, 04.10.06

Online gaming banned in US, 04.10.06

The application of TUPE in outsourcing deals, 25.09.06

Copyright ruling against Google news links in Belgium, 19.09.06

Competition law - Yamaha forced to change anti-internet distribution policy, 18.09.06

Data protection, passage of customer information between businesses, 15.09.06

Ownership of database rights between agent and principal, 15.09.06

Data protection, binding corporate rules, 15.09.06

Article on legal issues with blogging, 13.09.06

DMH, Osborne Clarke lawyers set up IP/IT firm, 14.08.06