Indirect and consequential loss - excluding liability

A recent case has shown the importance of having your limitations on liability checked to ensure that they reflect the current law on the subject.

In the case of Ferryways NV v Associated British Ports (2008), the Court had to consider a clause in a stevedoring contract which excluded liability for "indirect or consequential [loss] including without limitation ... loss of profit and ... the liabilities of the Customer to any third party."

A member of the crew of the claimant's vessel had been killed by the stevedore defendant's subcontractor, resulting in the claimant having to make a payment to the crew-member's family. The claimant sought to recover the amount from the stevedores, who said that this was excluded by the above clause because it was a liability to a third party.

The High Court rejected the defendant's argument because the amount paid was a direct consequence of the stevedore's breach. The clause would only have excluded liability for liabilities to third parties (or loss of profit for that matter) where that liability was not a direct or natural result of the breach.

This case once again demonstrates that if a party wants to exclude liability for loss of profits, third party claims or other such losses, the exclusion must be drafted very carefully in order to be enforceable in most circumstances.

For more information or assistance, please contact a member of our team.

news

 

Bribery Act - an overview

Improvements for Employers, 17 01 2011

Employment law changes for 2011, 17 01 2011

Dismissal for promotion of spiritualism not belief discrimination, 17 01 2011

iLaw acting on largest case of 2011

Equality Act 2010, 15.10.2010

TUPE consultation failure case, 15.10.10

Garden leave case, 15.10.10

Minimum wage increases, 15.10.2010

UK tops false sick day league

Employment Tribunal claims rise

Smoking dismissal can be unfair

Redundancy Payment age cap ruled lawful

World Cup Employment Law Briefing, 25 05 2010

Stephen Eckett speaking at Get2Business09

Lawyer Awards, 07.05.09

TUPE hits law firm 03.04.09

Change proposed to redundancy pay 03.04.09

Employment claims rise, 03.04.09

Changes to statutory entitlements, 03.04.09

Statutory employment dispute procedures abolished, 03.04.09

Reseller trade mark use, 18.12.08

FT Innovative Lawyers

FT Innovative Lawyers Awards, 11.08.08

Without Prejudice in Employment, 21.04.08

Key redundancy issues, 21.04.08

Indirect and consequential loss exclusions, 13.03.08

iLaw featured in The Lawyer, 12.11.07

New Companies Act requires details on websites and e-mails, 16.01.07

European Court decision on freezer cabinet exclusivity, 13.10.06

iLaw featured in Lawyer article on boutique firms, 05.10.06

Google victory in US, 04.10.06

Online gaming banned in US, 04.10.06

The application of TUPE in outsourcing deals, 25.09.06

Copyright ruling against Google news links in Belgium, 19.09.06

Competition law - Yamaha forced to change anti-internet distribution policy, 18.09.06

Data protection, passage of customer information between businesses, 15.09.06

Ownership of database rights between agent and principal, 15.09.06

Data protection, binding corporate rules, 15.09.06

Article on legal issues with blogging, 13.09.06

DMH, Osborne Clarke lawyers set up IP/IT firm, 14.08.06